Takeoff — review the count

Measured, not assumed. 49 homerun callout(s) on E110 resolve to 70 circuit run(s) across panel(s) A, B; each panel was located from its own converging callouts and each run is Manhattan from its callout back to ITS panel at 18 points per foot. This is the step that turns conduit from an allowance into a measurement — on the pilot job it moved EMT error from +17% to −2%. Wire is 3 conductors over each path with a 1.05 route allowance, plus 2.6 ft per conductor per box for makeup. The allowance applies to WIRE ONLY — estimators pull along wall-following paths longer than Manhattan while the conduit itself takes none, which is blind-proven. Gauge is the drawing default; the firm upsizes most kitchen and equipment branch to #10, and that is policy rather than a drawing fact, so it is flagged rather than applied silently.

Measured, not assumed. 49 homerun callout(s) on E110 resolve to 70 circuit run(s) across panel(s) A, B; each panel was located from its own converging callouts and each run is Manhattan from its callout back to ITS panel at 18 points per foot. This is the step that turns conduit from an allowance into a measurement — on the pilot job it moved EMT error from +17% to −2%. Each run carries 10 ft rise and 5 ft stub at 1.15 waste, and NO routing factor — one was fitted on a single job and retired when two others disagreed. Conduit is taken off per circuit even where homeruns physically share pipe, which is the firm's own practice. THIS FOOTAGE IS A PATHWAY AGGREGATE, NOT A SIZE. The drawings annotate no branch conduit size per run — only a handful of general notes name a size for a specific stub — so the reader measures the pathway and declines to invent the 1/2" / 3/4" / 1" split. It is carried on the 3/4" line because the estimate has to price somewhere, and the size split is an open flag for the estimator, not a number the model knows. The firm's own scoring rule says this is the right unit anyway: against an estimator who consolidates or flips method, geometry is scored as the total pathway aggregate across all raceway sizes — on Mendocino the raw 3/4" comparison read 4,283 against 1,044 and was method-distorted garbage, while the pathway aggregate landed +0.7%. Panel A was located from the densest cluster of 4 homerun callouts of 41. Panel B was located from the densest cluster of 3 homerun callouts of 5. Panel(s) MDP could not be located — too few callouts converge on them — so their circuits are reported and carry no footage. Measuring them from a guessed origin would put a number on the estimate that nothing supports. Each circuit is measured Manhattan from its callout back to its own panel, plus 10 ft rise and 5 ft stub, at 1.15 waste. Conduit carries no routing factor — one was fitted on a single job and retired when two others disagreed. Wire takes a 1.05 route allowance because estimators pull along wall-following paths longer than Manhattan, plus 2.6 ft per conductor per box for makeup. Conduit is taken off per circuit even where homeruns physically share pipe, which is the firm’s own practice and how the estimates this is compared against are built. Callouts were accepted only where the prefix is a panel the schedules declare (A, B, BDP, MDP, MSB). Equipment tags of the same shape — CU-1, RTU-2, RJ-45 — are not circuits and are not measured.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 35 of tag B2. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 6, and the disagreement is reported rather than settled silently — a flagged disagreement beats a confident wrong number. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_B2 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $12.31 and 1.345 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 14 of tag C3. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_C3_LOW_PROFILE_LED_4FT is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $0.00 and 0.6 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 14 of tag T1. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 9, and the disagreement is reported rather than settled silently — a flagged disagreement beats a confident wrong number. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_T1_TRACK_HEADS is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $0.00 and 0.35 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 9 of tag A1. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 1, and the disagreement is reported rather than settled silently — a flagged disagreement beats a confident wrong number. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_A1 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $16.60 and 1.685 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 8 of tag E7. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 11, and the disagreement is reported rather than settled silently — a flagged disagreement beats a confident wrong number. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_E7 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $6.84 and 0.755 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 7 of tag B1. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_B1 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $12.31 and 1.195 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 6 of tag H1. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by HS/TLS and installed by HS, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_H1 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $6.84 and 0.755 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 5 of tag E1. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 4, and the disagreement is reported rather than settled silently — a flagged disagreement beats a confident wrong number. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_E1 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $6.84 and 0.755 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 4 of tag B3. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_B3 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $12.31 and 1.195 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 4 of tag T-6. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_T_6_TRACKS_6 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $0.00 and 0.65 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 4 of tag W1. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 4 as well, so both sources agree. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by WCS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_W1 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $29.70 and 0.545 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 3 of tag E2. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 3 as well, so both sources agree. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_E2 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $6.84 and 0.755 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 3 of tag E4. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep counted 5, and the disagreement is reported rather than settled silently — a flagged disagreement beats a confident wrong number. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_E4 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $6.84 and 0.755 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 2 of tag C0. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. Nothing prices this yet: no assembly in the library carries this tag, so it is counted and reported but stays outside the total until an estimator attaches a build-up.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 2 of tag C2. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_C2_LOW_PROFILE_LED_3FT is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $0.00 and 0.4 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 2 of tag J4. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_J4 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $13.74 and 1.225 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 1 of tag P6. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. The assembly FIXTURE_P6 is PROPOSED by exact tag match against the firm's own library — it prices at $27.92 and 2.735 hours each, and nothing reaches the total until a named person accepts it.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 1 of tag S1. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. Nothing prices this yet: no assembly in the library carries this tag, so it is counted and reported but stays outside the total until an estimator attaches a build-up.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 1 of tag T-8. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. Nothing prices this yet: no assembly in the library carries this tag, so it is counted and reported but stays outside the total until an estimator attaches a build-up.

Read from the LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE on E100: 1 of tag TCL-2. The schedule carries its own count column, which is exact where it exists, so it is the quantity here. The plan tag sweep found none, which usually means the tags are drawn inside symbol blocks rather than as free text. Worth a look on the drawing before accepting. The schedule's own responsibility columns say furnished by TLS and installed by GC, which answers the supply-and-install question without an RFI. The engineering firm (EVERJ ENGINEERING, INC) has no conventions file, so this line carries a semantic-risk flag: a misread symbol convention is a 3x error that no percentage band expresses. Nothing prices this yet: no assembly in the library carries this tag, so it is counted and reported but stays outside the total until an estimator attaches a build-up.

Added by house rule: RRE priced this on 4 of 4 past jobs (100%). RRE’s last retail job carried 8 hours of panel safe-off; RRE practice is about 1 hour per panel touched, 8 hours on BYLT and Varley too. Recommended: RRE Components 31784, 8HRS PANELS SAFE OFF, once.